Skip Navigation [accesskey = 2]

Energy Use for Water

The Case for Integrating Water and Energy Efficiency Programs

    While energy and water are closely tied, only a handful of utilities have fully capitalized on this knowledge by combining their efficiency programs. Utilities that have collaborated - a few of which are profiled in the conservation synergy report - have overwhelmingly found such programs to be a good business decision. The benefits are manifold: higher participation rates, increased customer satisfaction, coordinated and complementary program design, and an improved reputation from working smarter - not harder.

Western states have long depended on major water transfer projects. Most of these projects, such as the Central Arizona Project (CAP), the Central Utah Project (CUP), the California Aqueduct, to name a few, tap the Colorado River. But to move these vast volumes of water, these projects also consume tremendous amounts of energy. For example, CAP is the single biggest consumer of energy in the state of Arizona.
Today, almost every western state has a proposed new water supply project—pipelines like the Flaming Gorge Pipeline that would move 225,000 AF of water up to 500 miles, from Flaming Gorge Reservoir to the Front Range of Colorado. The RWSP would lift water over the continental divide, and if powered by electricity, have greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to burning 48 million gallons of gasoline each year.
Most new water supplies will be increasingly energy-intensive, with two exceptions: water conservation and recycled water.

Pipelines map Carlsbad Desalination Project California Aqueduct Yuma Desalting Plant Central Arizona Project Lake Powell Pipeline Central Utah Project San Juan-Chama Project Southern Delivery System Yampa Pumpback Northern Integrated Supply Project Windy Gap Firming Project Regional Water Supply Project  - "Million Pipeline" Groundwater Development Project
Existing Projects in the Colorado Basin:

Proposed New Projects:

Energy Intensity of Western Water Supplies

Water conservation also saves energy and money for utilities and customers. In fact, for many utilities, energy is the second biggest cost (second only to staff salaries). And on average, heating water represents 14 - 25% of a household’s energy use.

For the household, low flow showerheads, efficient clothes washers, and faucets represent the biggest opportunities for saving energy through water conservation.

Indoor Water-Energy Intensity

For more information on specific proposed pipelines, see WRA’s presentation on pipelines and powerplants or click directly on the links above. For detailed information about the energy intensity of water in Colorado and the potential for water conservation to reduce energy use in the state, see WRA’s report to the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB).